Відео

Hello! Thank you! I had a great time. I was wondering if you ever made the videos about shot and montage? I can't seem to find them if they exist. Thanks again

what happens with transgenderism in this case? considering that if I have been performing as a "man" or in a manly way I feel like a man, then why would I change or have a desire to be the opposite gender? By this logic gender is just masculine/feminine right? Like if I as a man act womanly then in that moment I'm actually "being a woman"?

thank you for the explanation!

Thank you very much, great video. Creative, informative, clear and entertaining.

This is so insightful. I try to understand various gender theories for some time now, and as you said there is a lot of misconceptions rooted even in examples Butler gave herself. This explanation (and previous episode) were both in depth and compacted very well. Thanks! Side note: UA-cam's algorithm can be super useful if one trains it correctly ;)

Thank you for the lessons. It would be much appreciated if you could add a lesson on Thomas Elsaesser's Film Theory (Through The Senses)

I am a student of English literature from India. Bunch of thanks ✨ ✨ ✨ for making such an awesome video on this essay. My doubts got cleared because of this.

Ty. You make it so easy to understand.

according to you, can we apply any of these concepts to social media images? I see many similarities and I am thinking to do so.

Ty

This was soooooo good!

Thank you for your videos. It is just very ironic that Ari Folman's (the director) words about the ongoing war in Gaza oppose his thesis in this film about fact and documentation. When he talks about October 7th, he refers to beheaded babies, which has been proven to be misinformation by several investigations. It seems that the filmmaker is not truly honest in his narrative in the film. The film is emphasizing the importance of accurate historical documentation, personal accountability, and truth but it seems the director himself doesn't believe in it. See the Guardian article on what he said on November 3rd, 2023.

Here an extract of an article in The Economist about her last book "Who's afraid of gender": The problem is that pretty soon, the author leaves the path of gay-rights advocacy and disappears down an ideological rabbit hole. Soon after critiques of “the so-called facts of sex”, the tq+ overwhelms the lgb. The result is a stir-fry of disingenuous provocations, served up with a large portion of post-modern word salad. The reader is left wondering how Butler ever became so influential. Butler smears the growing army of liberal-minded women who oppose these views on sex and gender, including J.K. Rowling, as hysterical right-wingers allied with the pope, Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin. Soon the author descends into the quicksand of intersectionality, where all oppressions overlap, accusing people who criticise the Butler perspective of buttressing “white supremacy”. By the end, all opponents are extremists. The words “fascism” and “fascist” appear nearly 70 times. The book is a lesson in how well-meaning activism can overreach. The author has lent intellectual credibility to a theory that has, as recently revealed in the Cass Review commissioned about England’s youth-gender services, caused harm to many young people, some of whom are autistic, depressed or simply gay. Channelling Butler’s theories, some activists are labelling those who oppose giving minors cross-sex hormones as “bigots”."

WHAT EFFECT IS USED ON THAT VIDEO OF THE TRAIN THAT TURNS IT ONLY BLACK AND WHITE?

Thanks dude 👍

Gender cannot be separated from biological determinism, as a product of reason. Intellect is an instrument of nature's will, gender is simply a combination of what we have historically expected from gender, what things we are most attracted to, and in this we can still see with the greatest certainty the power of nature's will and evolution. Lust speaks for itself, we can see the same patterns of beauty throughout the ages that were related to the sign of genetic health and strength, if we are not talking about the gluttonous baroque nobility. See what's still in the spotlight. Intellect does not stand at the pinnacle of existence, but blind will. We cannot think of the intellect and its products apart from the motive power of everything. Lies and sophistry are not opinions and must be condemned as such. This is not philosophy, but politics.

I like the way that pops spins John Goodman did a great job there

your videos are amazing man

Hi from Italy. While its obvious that neorealism was influenced by soviet and franch movies (authors like Eisenstein, Pudovkin, Renoir and Carnè), some say early Yazushiro Ozu also influence d it. Since Ozu's movies were not released in Italy not even in Venice film festival, main authors like Rossellini, De Sica or Visconti never mentioned watching them and also no Italian essay reports Ozu's influence, I think there's no connection of them with neorealism. What do you think?

This is really inspiring! Thanks for sharing :)

Why a photo of a thing is different than a painting of the thing? It doesn't make sense.

Hello friend, i'd like to ask where are Althusser quotes from? specifically the ones at 10:53 and 11:10

I am working on my final assignment (we're calling it a home exam but it's the same thing) as we speak, you've been such a massive help ever since I've discovered your channel this semester. <3 Also it caught me so off guard hearing someone talk about a Hebrew film - hearing Hebrew in the middle of an English lecture made me double take for a second - and then giggle at how polite the English translation of how rudely Ori describes the 80% of the test subjects in that experiment HAHA (he calls the other 20% the normal/more sane ones, and the subtitles just gloss over that) - it's very interesting how Israelis can be so casually rude in their speech but it is often translated so nicely in the subtitles, and for no reason too, making it quite charming in my opinion :)

I really needed this video! Thank you so much for explaining this so simply!

More cavell please !,!

Where are the women?

Photogénie is what separates film from theater

Theory doesn't seem to mean much in philosophy beyond "I think ...". How exactly did Judith propose we test this "theory"?

Classic example of intellectuals thinking themselves into a hole where scientists ( and just about everyone else ) had figured out centuries before.

Pleaseee make a video more particularly about Affect theory also, Like Massumi and Sara Ahmed on image ... thanks!

How does this apply to Taylor Swift

Please create more content 🤍 We need YOU

Who cares. Feminists hate the "male gaze" but women look at themselves and get turned on too.

6:41 isnt it first level=camera and second level=character in the text? Without identifing firstly with camera/image/screen, spectator can not identify with a character.

thank you!

Thank you SO much!

😮😮😮😮let me rewatch all these movies

Perfect

Awesome!

What an incredible video!! Thank you so much!

Anybody know where that Maurice Merleau Ponty quote came from? I have been trying to cite it for my essay due Monday and have been looking for the source for two hours.

The boy and brain can’t be seperate it’s Al interconnected regardless of a person’s sex! No! Sex isn’t a spectrum, and yes I’m including intersex people because they’re intersex male and female. This sounds like passion-science!

This is ridiculous! This is not direct towards you, it’s towards her discussion/ideas. They’re muddling everything. Sex is real, gender is part of sex, based on sex, our our gendered roles and due to these expectations, people, men & women are expected to live up to those roles. However, not everyone expresses themselves into these harmful stereotypical categories of boys and girls; meaning the person is usually homosexual or enjoys cross dressing. There sex is still there, and I can’t support queer theory.

Wasn't sex already frowned upon in Christian doctrines? The suppression of lust and sexuality is already mentioned by ancient Greek philosophers (i.e. apathea).

thank you so much for making this video! i'm learning about this in my course and i was so happy to find this as i didn't really understand. keep it up!

What is a woman? An adult human female. Roles of women. Roles of women. It’s the societal roles of women that women rebelled against. Butler intentionally conflates roles of women with what is a woman.

nice analysis man, I really loved the movie and really loved what you said about it!!

Read somewhere that one can't have the concept of heterosexuality without the concept of homosexuality. That is a strange thing, mainly because one can have the concept of gravity without the concept of anti-gravity. And many concept don't have an opposite, because those concept don't necessarily refer to a quality of something. The concept of sky doesn't represent a quality. In the same way, heterosexuality is not necessarily a quality.

Barthes' life span 1915-1980 in 02:11

But female is a necessary condition of women gender . Also, humans have heterosexual instinct .